Introduction
Basic information
Developer Name: Konami
Full Name: Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow
Release Date: October 4, 2005 (DS) | Included in the Castlevania Advance Collection: Dominus Collection
Released on: Originally Nintendo DS | Now also available on modern platforms via the collection
Cross Play: No
Initial thoughts
I played Dawn of Sorrow as part of the Dominus Collection, and it was a joy to return to it after all these years. As a long-time Castlevania fan, especially of the Sorrow saga, this game still holds a special place in my heart. Aria of Sorrow set the bar incredibly high. And while Dawn of Sorrow builds on that foundation in exciting ways, it also stumbles hard in a few areas.
It’s a solid Castlevania title with a compelling story, addictive gameplay, and a fantastic soul system. But it’s also weighed down by grind-heavy mechanics, some odd design choices, and a plot that feels like it’s trying to do too much too fast.
Story and setting
Plot overview
Set a year after Aria of Sorrow, Dawn of Sorrow continues the story of Soma Cruz, a young man who carries Dracula’s soul within him. This time, a cult wants to resurrect Dracula by forcing Soma to embrace his dark destiny. It’s a great premise, with returning characters and new faces, but the story feels rushed, and several plot threads are left unresolved or undercooked by the end.
World building and immersion
The gothic setting is just as atmospheric as ever. The castle design, eerie backdrops, and musical cues all pull you into this world. However, many rooms and areas feel less distinct compared to Aria, giving the castle a slightly more generic vibe at times.
Character development
Soma still stands out as one of the best protagonists in Castlevania history, but most of the new characters. Like Celia and Dmitrii don’t quite leave the same impact. The returning cast is welcome, but their development stalls.
Emotional impact
While it has its moments—especially with the themes of identity and resisting fate—it doesn’t hit quite as hard as its predecessor.
Rating for story and setting
I have visited multiple aspects of the story and after some thought and objective thinking, I rated the story and setting with a 7.
Gameplay and mechanics
Core gameplay mechanics
The Tactical Soul system is back and more refined than ever, allowing Soma to steal powers from enemies and customize his arsenal. Souls are split into Bullet, Guardian, Enchant, and Ability types, adding a layer of strategy to every loadout. The controls are sharp, and combat remains fluid and satisfying.
Difficulty and balance
The game is relatively balanced early on, but difficulty spikes appear, especially if you aren’t lucky with soul drops. Some boss fights are fun and memorable, but others feel like damage sponges.
Pacing of the game
The core pacing is good but the grinding for 9 souls to max out abilities? Absolutely kills momentum. It turns into a repetitive chore rather than a rewarding mechanic.
Innovation and uniqueness
Dawn added soul fusion with weapons, giving a deeper level of customization. It also included some use of the DS’s touchscreen (mostly gimmicky seal-drawing for bosses), which hasn’t aged particularly well.
Controls and user interface
Controls are responsive and fast. Navigating menus and equipping souls is smooth, though the interface is a bit clunky by modern standards.
Microtransactions
None—this is a full game with all content unlocked through gameplay.
Rating
After combing through many of the mechanics, the pacing and other factors of this game, I rated the gameplay and mechanics with a 7.5.
Graphics and art style
Quality of graphics and art direction
For a DS game, the sprites, and effects look fantastic, and spell animations are flashy and rewarding. However, the anime-style character portraits introduced in this entry may feel like a step down from Aria’s more gothic designs. It’s not bad, just stylistically inconsistent with the tone.
Technical performances
Runs well with no major slowdowns, even in rooms filled with enemies or particle effects.
Environment and design uniqueness
Environments, while well-rendered, lack the iconic flair of older Castlevania games. The castle feels less like a living, breathing space and more like a game map.
Rating
It took me some time to give the graphics and art style an objective rating. There are many things to consider, but ultimately, I rated this section with a 7.0
Sound and music
Music score and how it contributed to the game
Castlevania never misses here. Dawn of Sorrow features an energetic and eerie soundtrack, filled with memorable tunes that match the mood perfectly.
Sound effects quality
Satisfying impact sounds and spell effects keep the gameplay snappy.
Voice Acting
Very minimal, as expected for a DS title, but what’s there works fine.
Rating
After a lot of consideration, I rated the sound and music section with an 8.
Replayability
Game Length and content volume
A full playthrough takes around 8–12 hours, depending on your grind tolerance and exploration.
Extra Content
You can unlock Julius Mode, which lets you play as Julius Belmont, Yoko, and Alucard, a fun bonus that adds replay value.
Replay value
Plenty of content if you’re into completing the soul collection, unlocking gear, and taking on hard mode. That said, the soul grinding can get very tedious and may discourage 100% completion.
Rating
After thoughtful consideration, I decided to rate the replayability and game length of Castlevania Dawn of Sorrow with a 7.
Suggestions and comparisons
Suggestions and feedback
Reduce the number of souls needed to max abilities.
Add more unique boss designs and fight mechanics.
Expand the story with more fleshed-out character arcs.
Comparisons
Compared to Aria of Sorrow, Dawn is more ambitious but less polished in its narrative and pacing. Compared to other Metroidvania titles, it still ranks highly, but games like Hollow Knight and Symphony of the Night outshine it in depth and exploration.
Personal experiences and anecdotes
Revisiting Dawn of Sorrow was a blast. I enjoyed diving back into the soul system and testing out fun combinations. But around the time I was grinding for that ninth Mandragora soul, I felt my enthusiasm starting to fade. I still pushed through, and unlocking Julius Mode gave me another reason to smile. Despite its flaws, I was happy to relive it. I still believe Soma deserves more love in the Castlevania timeline.
Rating
Taking in all the personal experiences with Castlevania Dawn of Sorrow, I give it a personal rating of 8.
Last words
Pros
- Excellent soul system
- Fast, responsive combat
- Soma Cruz remains a great protagonist
- Great boss fights (mostly)
- Engaging weapon fusion mechanic
- Unlockable Julius Mode with multiple characters
- Fantastic soundtrack
- Strong gothic atmosphere
- Plenty of customization
- Responsive controls and tight platforming
Cons
- Excessive soul grinding
- Story feels rushed and underdeveloped
- Anime portraits feel out of place
- Touchscreen seal-drawing mechanic is gimmicky
- Environmental variety is lacking
- Some underwhelming new characters
- Boss difficulty can be uneven
- Several loose narrative threads
- Castle design is more generic than previous titles
- No real use of post-game beyond Julius Mode
Castlevania Dawn of Sorrow is a good game hiding behind massive mechanical grind and a slightly unfocused story. It has the bones of a great Metroidvania and the soul of a classic Castlevania title, but it doesn’t quite rise to the heights of its predecessor. Still, for longtime fans of Soma and the series, it’s a journey worth taking again, flaws and all.
FINAL RATING
7.5
Please let me know what you think of Castlevania Dawn of Sorrow in the comments!
I hope you enjoyed reading this review, I hope to see you in the next review!
If you liked reading this review, maybe you would like to share this review with your friends.
Yeah i like those climats also good to hear gameplay aspects are quite refined. On the other hand this grind really sounds worring. Video time.
The grind is a big problem!
I agree the soul system was fun, even if the grinding got a bit old sometimes.
The grinding is indeed a problem.
While I do agree on these points, there is a romhack for Dawn of Sorrow called “Dawn of Sorrow Definitive Edition+” that fixes alot of issues with the game that you brought up, it enhances the portraits, gets rid of touch screen mechanics, fixes some bugs, allows Alucard’s Sword to be obtained, among other things, I found it here, it’s really a great mod and I highly recommend it https://www.romhacking.net/hacks/5610/
Oh, that is indeed a very good looking rom hack, I might even try and review it!
Definitely not the best castlevania. Between the touchscreen and the grinding can definitely put people off.
Yeah, it does put people off, but the touchscreen is gone in the collection!
Doesn’t look like their best game, but still looks fine to play it
You are correct!
I have an interest to try completing a castlevania game one day, but seeing how there is an excessive grinding it kinda discourage me. Probably I’m just going to play symphony of the night.
Symphony of the night is much better!
HLTB is echoing a similar time frame and man, that’s pretty short for a game when there’s a lot of soul grinding, may be a bit too tedious for my tastes.
It is a bit tedious to be honest!
It does sound like I may still enjoy it, despite it’s flaws. Of course, I still need to beat Aria of Sorrow first! XD
Well, get playing then!
After reading the reviews, I thought that collecting things of any kind is tricky to balance.
It is indeed tricky to make the right balance!
Sounds like a solid game. Probably Not the best of the series. The level design looks quite komplex.
It is indeed quite complex!
Is it just me that Aria of Sorrow looked better too? This one has weird run animation. 😀
It’s still a good Castlevania game, but a bit mediocre. :/
Aria of Sorrow does indeed look better!
So sounds like the main attraction is Soma Cruz, and the grind is really bad.
Yep, that’s it!
I’m kinda surprised to not see an almost perfect rating here, but I actually never got into the Castlevania franchise at all. I think I started gaming too late for that and now I’m not pulled in by any nostalgia. I always only heard people praise it and how much they loved the games. I guess what we want from games has just shifted a lot over the years.
It does indeed shift and change for everyone, but this entry was a bit lackluster. Maybe it is what started the downfall of Castlevania games?
sounds good to have a variable “loadout” system so to say… but too much grind sounds a bit less nice though. (if it’s too much grind)
It is a lot of grind!
This game’s soundtracks similar like Vampire Survivors.
Vampire Survivors took music from Castlevania! (Licensed)
I like this reincarnation version of Dracula
Who doesn’t?
I think that’s probably not bad game, but Steam version and remake or remaster is needed for at least 1080p HD graphics.
How about just a new Castlevania 2D game at all??? It has been so long.
The Tactical Soul system is really interesting but sad to hear that it is a bit grindy here 🙁
You can leave the bit out, it is very grindy!
The combat sounds quite intricate and fun to learn! The world and lore also seems cool! This one seems like it was relying on the Castlevania branding though and could have used some more creative/qol improvements
It indeed needed more qol improvements!
I like this review! This gothic atmosphere and terrifying bosses are awesome in Castlevania.
Bosses are indeed awesome!